Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Alabama

Americans have long understood that their birthplace can significantly affect their futures, and academics have increasingly been able to connect tangible early life factors like where they live and the friendships they’ve cultivated with potential future income.

Among the most recent studies shedding light on what’s known as economic mobility—a person’s ability to move themselves and their families up the socioeconomic ladder over their lifetime—are a series of papers authored by Harvard University researchers leveraging vast troves of social networking data.

As part of a national analysis, Wealth Enhancement Group used data from Harvard University‘s Social Capital Atlas project to identify where in Alabama children have the best (and worst) chances at upward economic mobility.

The research draws on a privacy-protected dataset representing 21 billion friendships from Facebook made public through its parent company Meta’s Data for Good project. It also uses anonymous tax records, according to the authors. The scholars assigned a score to locales according to how economically connected low- and high-income people living in the area have historically been over at least a decade, per that data. The dataset does not include scores for about 180 of the 3,000 or so counties in the U.S.

The research attempts to fill in the gaps of previous efforts to study American economic mobility that did not consider a person’s vast social networks nor their importance in creating better lives for themselves and their children.

It turns out the ability to cultivate friendships linking people of different socioeconomic backgrounds with one another is the strongest factor in determining whether a child can surpass the earning potential of their parents, Harvard researchers found. They call this economic connectedness.

Read on to find out where economic connectedness is strongest in your state.

Canva

#50. Sumter County

– Economic connectedness: 0.55

– Median Income: $27,099

– Population: 12,482

— 25.7% white

— 71.3% Black

— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 1.3% Asian

Thomas Burks // Shutterstock

#49. Randolph County

– Economic connectedness: 0.55

– Median Income: $47,081

– Population: 21,984

— 77.1% white

— 18.6% Black

— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.1% Asian

Canva

#48. Marshall County

– Economic connectedness: 0.56

– Median Income: $52,938

– Population: 97,179

— 88.8% white

— 2.9% Black

— 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.7% Asian

Canva

#47. Clarke County

– Economic connectedness: 0.57

– Median Income: $44,108

– Population: 23,346

— 52% white

— 45.4% Black

— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.4% Asian

John H. Davis // Shutterstock

#46. Russell County

– Economic connectedness: 0.57

– Median Income: $44,065

– Population: 58,695

— 47.2% white

— 44.7% Black

— 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 1.1% Asian

Canva

#45. Mobile County

– Economic connectedness: 0.57

– Median Income: $51,169

– Population: 414,620

— 57.4% white

— 36.1% Black

— 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 2% Asian

Curtis Lee Newton // Shutterstock

#44. Franklin County

– Economic connectedness: 0.57

– Median Income: $43,633

– Population: 32,034

— 78.1% white

— 4.4% Black

— 1% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.3% Asian

Canva

#43. Marengo County

– Economic connectedness: 0.58

– Median Income: $35,379

– Population: 19,397

— 45.4% white

— 51.3% Black

— 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.5% Asian

Canva

#42. Houston County

– Economic connectedness: 0.58

– Median Income: $50,222

– Population: 106,355

— 67.4% white

— 27.3% Black

— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.9% Asian

JNix // Shutterstock

#41. Clay County

– Economic connectedness: 0.58

– Median Income: $45,163

– Population: 14,184

— 82.1% white

— 13.3% Black

— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.2% Asian

Carl Banks Photography // Shutterstock

#40. Jackson County

– Economic connectedness: 0.58

– Median Income: $43,785

– Population: 52,548

— 90.4% white

— 3.5% Black

— 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.3% Asian

Canva

#39. Geneva County

– Economic connectedness: 0.59

– Median Income: $43,581

– Population: 26,604

— 84.2% white

— 9.6% Black

— 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.6% Asian

Leah G Moloney // Shutterstock

#38. Hale County

– Economic connectedness: 0.59

– Median Income: $32,294

– Population: 14,819

— 38.3% white

— 59% Black

— 0% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.3% Asian

Canva

#37. DeKalb County

– Economic connectedness: 0.59

– Median Income: $44,037

– Population: 71,554

— 83.7% white

— 1.6% Black

— 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.1% Asian

Canva

#36. Etowah County

– Economic connectedness: 0.59

– Median Income: $46,984

– Population: 103,468

— 78.3% white

— 15.6% Black

— 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.7% Asian

JNix // Shutterstock

#35. Pike County

– Economic connectedness: 0.6

– Median Income: $40,106

– Population: 33,176

— 57.2% white

— 36.5% Black

— 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 2% Asian

Canva

#34. Jefferson County

– Economic connectedness: 0.6

– Median Income: $58,330

– Population: 672,550

— 50.9% white

— 42.9% Black

— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 1.7% Asian

Canva

#33. Winston County

– Economic connectedness: 0.6

– Median Income: $46,096

– Population: 23,650

— 94.1% white

— 0.9% Black

— 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.2% Asian

EWY Media // Shutterstock

#32. Calhoun County

– Economic connectedness: 0.6

– Median Income: $50,977

– Population: 116,425

— 72.8% white

— 21.5% Black

— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.8% Asian

Canva

#31. Covington County

– Economic connectedness: 0.6

– Median Income: $46,186

– Population: 37,490

— 84.1% white

— 12.3% Black

— 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.6% Asian

Canva

#30. Henry County

– Economic connectedness: 0.6

– Median Income: $55,870

– Population: 17,165

— 70% white

— 26.6% Black

— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.4% Asian

Shackleford Photography // Shutterstock

#29. Cherokee County

– Economic connectedness: 0.6

– Median Income: $43,475

– Population: 24,975

— 91.5% white

— 4.7% Black

— 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.1% Asian

Canva

#28. Crenshaw County

– Economic connectedness: 0.61

– Median Income: $43,103

– Population: 13,300

— 70.6% white

— 24.5% Black

— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 1.3% Asian

Canva

#27. Morgan County

– Economic connectedness: 0.62

– Median Income: $56,128

– Population: 122,608

— 77.6% white

— 13.1% Black

— 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.5% Asian

JNix // Shutterstock

#26. Pickens County

– Economic connectedness: 0.63

– Median Income: $43,389

– Population: 19,240

— 57.2% white

— 40.1% Black

— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0% Asian

Canva

#25. Bibb County

– Economic connectedness: 0.63

– Median Income: $54,277

– Population: 22,412

— 75.9% white

— 22.3% Black

— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.2% Asian

Canva

#24. Chilton County

– Economic connectedness: 0.64

– Median Income: $56,243

– Population: 44,857

— 81.1% white

— 8.8% Black

— 1.4% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.5% Asian

Canva

#23. Lawrence County

– Economic connectedness: 0.64

– Median Income: $51,712

– Population: 33,089

— 77.1% white

— 10.4% Black

— 5.4% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.2% Asian

Canva

#22. Dale County

– Economic connectedness: 0.64

– Median Income: $50,052

– Population: 49,443

— 70.8% white

— 20.7% Black

— 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 1.4% Asian

Canva

#21. Walker County

– Economic connectedness: 0.64

– Median Income: $47,442

– Population: 65,194

— 88.6% white

— 5.9% Black

— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.2% Asian

Jennifer Kinkead McNutt // Shutterstock

#20. Marion County

– Economic connectedness: 0.64

– Median Income: $44,551

– Population: 29,392

— 91.6% white

— 4% Black

— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.3% Asian

Wayne James // Shutterstock

#19. Colbert County

– Economic connectedness: 0.64

– Median Income: $52,017

– Population: 56,789

— 78.2% white

— 16.4% Black

— 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.5% Asian

Tracy Burroughs Brown // Shutterstock

#18. Tuscaloosa County

– Economic connectedness: 0.65

– Median Income: $57,508

– Population: 223,945

— 62.5% white

— 32.2% Black

— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 1.7% Asian

Canva

#17. Cullman County

– Economic connectedness: 0.66

– Median Income: $52,690

– Population: 87,129

— 92.8% white

— 1.1% Black

— 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.4% Asian

Canva

#16. Choctaw County

– Economic connectedness: 0.68

– Median Income: $38,581

– Population: 12,792

— 56.7% white

— 41.3% Black

— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.1% Asian

Canva

#15. Coffee County

– Economic connectedness: 0.68

– Median Income: $59,034

– Population: 53,043

— 73.8% white

— 17% Black

— 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 1.4% Asian

Canva

#14. Fayette County

– Economic connectedness: 0.69

– Median Income: $43,960

– Population: 16,365

— 84.2% white

— 12.7% Black

— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.4% Asian

Canva

#13. Cleburne County

– Economic connectedness: 0.69

– Median Income: $48,333

– Population: 15,046

— 93.1% white

— 2.6% Black

— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0% Asian

Canva

#12. Elmore County

– Economic connectedness: 0.7

– Median Income: $67,597

– Population: 87,146

— 74.7% white

— 20.8% Black

— 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 1% Asian

Wayne James // Shutterstock

#11. Lauderdale County

– Economic connectedness: 0.7

– Median Income: $50,000

– Population: 93,342

— 85% white

— 10% Black

— 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.5% Asian

Canva

#10. Limestone County

– Economic connectedness: 0.7

– Median Income: $70,736

– Population: 101,217

— 77.4% white

— 13.1% Black

— 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 1.8% Asian

JNix // Shutterstock

#9. Washington County

– Economic connectedness: 0.7

– Median Income: $44,512

– Population: 15,574

— 65.8% white

— 23.8% Black

— 7.2% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.1% Asian

Canva

#8. Lamar County

– Economic connectedness: 0.72

– Median Income: $43,324

– Population: 13,929

— 86.9% white

— 11.1% Black

— 0% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.1% Asian

JNix // Shutterstock

#7. Autauga County

– Economic connectedness: 0.72

– Median Income: $62,660

– Population: 58,239

— 75.1% white

— 19.7% Black

— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 1.1% Asian

JNix // Shutterstock

#6. Blount County

– Economic connectedness: 0.73

– Median Income: $52,830

– Population: 58,884

— 92.5% white

— 1.3% Black

— 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.4% Asian

Canva

#5. Lee County

– Economic connectedness: 0.73

– Median Income: $57,191

– Population: 172,223

— 69.3% white

— 22.4% Black

— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 4.4% Asian

George Dodd III // Shutterstock

#4. Baldwin County

– Economic connectedness: 0.74

– Median Income: $64,346

– Population: 227,131

— 84.5% white

— 8.8% Black

— 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 1% Asian

Canva

#3. Madison County

– Economic connectedness: 0.75

– Median Income: $71,153

– Population: 382,149

— 66.7% white

— 24.3% Black

— 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 2.6% Asian

Riley Camp // Shutterstock

#2. St. Clair County

– Economic connectedness: 0.78

– Median Income: $65,070

– Population: 90,412

— 86.2% white

— 9.5% Black

— 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 0.6% Asian

JNix // Shutterstock

#1. Shelby County

– Economic connectedness: 0.82

– Median Income: $82,592

– Population: 220,780

— 78.7% white

— 12.6% Black

— 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native

— 1.9% Asian

This story features data reporting and writing by Dom DiFurio and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.

This story originally appeared on Wealth Enhancement Group and was produced and
distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.